Effect of inorganic nitrogen concentration in co-culture and regeneration media on Agrobacterium tumefaciens growth and on the regenerative capacity of transformed Pinus radiataembryonal mass
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Genetic Engineering program at Genomica Forestal SA, Chile (GFSA) has a goal of generating stably transformed radiata pine for in planta evaluation of candidate genes. Regeneration of transgenic plants depends mainly on two factors: regeneration ability of transformed cells and stable transgene integration and expression. In several conifer species, including radiata pine, transgenics have been regenerated through cocultivation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens with embryogenic cells [1-3]. However, in our first experiments using MSG [4] culture medium we found that radiata pine embryonal masses did not recover easily after co cultivation and that there was an excessive overgrowth of bacterial cells in spite of using bacteriostatics in the medium. This impediment prompted our study on testing other culture medium formulations, routinely used in conifer somatic embryogenesis, on the growth of A. tumefaciens GV3101. The tested media were: MSG, DCR [5], and modified Litvay [6] MLV. Of the three media MSG supported significantly higher bacterial growth than the other two media. One of the major differences in the composition of these media is inorganic nitrogen concentration (NH4NO3 and KNO3). Compared with MLV and DCR, MSG has the lowest concentration of inorganic nitrogen (100 mgl-1 compared with 340 in DCR and 950 mgl-l in MLV) provided in the sole form of KNO3. Based on our results and the work of others, we concluded that low nitrate concentration in MSG medium promoted A. tumefaciens growth and this had a deleterious influence on the viability of radiata pine cells during co cultivation, and also rendered eradication of bacterial cells difficult. Comparison of growth of radiata pine embryonal mass on the three media did not show statistically significant differences. A strategy for producing transgenic radiata pine for in planta transgene expression and stability study will be presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".