Breathing sounds spectral and higher order statistics changes from wakefulness to sleep in apneic and non-apneic people
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Breathing sounds analysis conveys valuable information in relation to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) during both sleep and wakefulness. In this study, we investigated whether the breathings sounds spectral and higher order statistics characteristics (HOS) change from wakefulness to sleep, and more importantly whether this change is associated with severity of OSA. Tracheal breathing sounds of 6 individuals with severe OSA and 6 non-OSA individuals during wakefulness and stage 2 of sleep, both in supine position, were used in this study. The sounds were recorded simultaneously with full overnight polysomnography (PSG) assessment. First, the sounds of 5 noise-free breathing cycles were extracted and sequestered into inspiratory and expiratory phase segments manually for each study subject. After normalizing each sound segment to its energy, spectral and HOS features were calculated. Several features including the median bispectral frequency (MBF), spectral bandwidth (BW) and bispectrum Harmonic Mean (HM) were found to change statistically significantly from wakefulness to sleep mostly in severe OSA group but not as much in non-OSA group. The most prominent and consistent change between the two groups of OSA and non-OSA was observed in MBF; it changed from wakefulness to sleep in the two groups in an opposite manner; this observation is congruent with the hypothesis that the upper airway in OSA population has an increased non-homogeneity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".