Vascularization of rat pituitary autografts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pituitary autotransplantation eliminates direct vascular contact between the hypothalamus and the adenohypophysis, and enables us to study the role of the hypothalamus in regulating adenohypophysial endocrine activity. The aim of this study was to investigate vascularization of the pituitary autografts. Three-month-old male Wistar rats were hypophysectomized, and their adenohypophyses were autotransplanted under the renal capsule. The animals were killed 3 weeks after autotransplantation. The grafts were removed and studied by using histology, immunohistochemistry and transmission electron microscopy. In the central portion of the grafts, organizing necrosis was apparent. The peripheral portion of the graft contained all adenohypophysial cell types, with a predominance of lactotrophs. Vascular endothelial growth factor and hypoxia-inducible factor were expressed in the graft mainly in the perinecrotic areas. Several capillaries inside the grafts were lined by continuous unfenestrated epithelium, while others were lined by fenestrated endothelium, suggesting that neovascularization is the result of two processes: ingrowths of capillaries from the renal capsule to the graft, and neoformation of capillaries from pre-existing adenohypophysial vessels. In conclusion, hypoxia seems to be an important factor in the vascularization of pituitary autografts. Mediated via hypoxia-inducible factor, hypoxia stimulates vascular endothelial growth factor secretion, which plays a crucial role in angiogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".