MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048335310 · doi:10.1142/s0129183101001948

PATTERN RECOGNITION WITH HAMILTONIAN DYNAMICS

2001· article· en· W2048335310 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics C · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonalizationHamiltonian (control theory)QuantumExcited stateComputer scienceHamiltonian systemArtificial neural networkStatistical physicsQuantum systemPhysicsTopology (electrical circuits)AlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematicsQuantum mechanicsClassical mechanicsMathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider pattern recognition schemes that are based upon Hamiltonian dynamical system. Different oscillatory modes are used for storing and encoding patterns, and the effect of resonance is used for determining the most excited mode. We also propose a new technique for pattern orthogonalization resorting to hidden dimensions. Numerical experiments confirm high storage capacity and absence of false memories for the proposed system. Hamiltonian systems may be important as classical analogs of quantum computing systems or quantum neural networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it