La médecine du travail au Québec : une pratique de santé publique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Quebec, occupational medicine focuses mainly on prevention and aims at improving workplaces. Occupational health services are part of the public health organization. The practice of selecting workers through pre-placement physical examination has been totally left aside and periodic medical surveillance is used only when tests meet the requirements of evidence-based medicine and serve preventive goals. It must be ensured that the course of illnesses can be changed before workers are submitted to screening tests or medical surveillance. The community health approach adopted in Quebec has proved its worth. Nevertheless, after more than 25 years, most workers and workplaces are not benefiting from the health services to which they are entitled; today, less than 25% of workers are able to enjoy every right they thought they had won long ago. Moreover, the political will has disappeared long ago. The development and survival of occupational health services and occupational medicine as part of public health practice are closely related to workers’ ability to have their rights respected and to the will of the nation to fulfill its promises.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".