Production of black holes and string balls in a two-dimensional split-fermion model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present cross-sections for the black hole and string ball production in proton-proton collisions in a TeV-scale gravity model with split fermions in two dimensions. The cross-section for black hole and string ball production in the split-fermion model is smaller than in the non-split-fermion model. The drop of the cross-section for the string ball production can be one to two orders of magnitude with the increase of the width of the brane from L = 0 to 15 TeV−1. The cross-section for string ball production in two-dimensional split fermion model reduces more in comparison to black holes. Black holes are quite hard to be observed at the LHC. In fact, taking into account the current experimental limits on the fundamental Planck scale, black holes cannot be produced at the LHC. Cross-section for string ball production depends significantly on string coupling constant, making it very model dependent. We investigate the range of values of string coupling constant from 0.02 to 0.4. There has been no evidence for production of string balls at $$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 8 TeV. A two-dimensional split fermion model with a extremely thick brane can account for the absence of signature of string balls for a world with the value of fundamental Planck scale even as low as 1 TeV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".