MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048381908 · doi:10.1029/2008jb006259

Seismic structure, gravity anomalies, and flexure of the Amazon continental margin, NE Brazil

2009· article· en· W2048381908 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyLithosphereSeismic refractionGravity anomalyCrustRiftSeismologyContinental marginSeafloor spreadingLithospheric flexureProgradationHorstPaleontologyFaciesTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seismic and gravity data have been used to determine the structure of the sediments, crust, and upper mantle that underlie the Amazon continental margin, offshore NE Brazil. Seismic reflection profile data reveal a major unconformity at ∼7 s two‐way travel time (TWTT) which we interpret as marking the onset of the transcontinental Amazon River and the formation of the Amazon deep‐sea fan system in the late Miocene. Seismic refraction data show mean sediment velocities that decrease by >1.5 km s −1 in a seaward direction. We attribute this decrease to facies changes associated with sediment progradation and the development of topset, foreset, and bottomset beds. Seismic refraction data show that the sediments are underlain by oceanic crust that has a similar velocity structure compared to elsewhere in the Atlantic Ocean but is unusually thin (∼4.2 km). We attribute the thin crust to either slow seafloor spreading or a limited magma supply during the initial rifting of South America and Africa in the Early Cretaceous. The seismic data have been used to construct a new sediment thickness grid that together with gravity anomaly data, suggests the Amazon fan loaded lithosphere with an unusually high flexural strength. While a high‐strength lithosphere explains the overall depth of the seismic Moho, there are discrepancies (of up to 2 km) beneath the upper fan, where the modeled flexed Moho is shallower than the seismic Moho, and beneath the middle fan, where it is deeper. Gravity and seismic modeling suggest these discrepancies are caused by lateral changes in subcrustal density such that the mantle underlying the upper fan is denser than it is beneath the middle fan. We attribute these lateral density differences to proximity to the Ceara Rise, which is believed to have formed during the Late Cretaceous in a mid‐ocean ridge setting. Fan loading of a relatively strong, dense, and, hence, cold lithosphere predicts stress orientations that are consistent with borehole breakout data and the location and height of the Gurupé Arch onshore. Despite its proximity to “leaky” transform faults, the margin that underlies the Amazon fan appears to be of nonvolcanic origin. The main differences with other nonvolcanic margins, such as West Iberia and Newfoundland, are a greater sediment accumulation, a narrower zone of transitional crust, and a lack of any evidence for extreme extension and mantle serpentinization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it