MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048384917 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.65.084001

Scalar, electromagnetic, and gravitational self-forces in weakly curved spacetimes

2002· article· en· W2048384917 on OpenAlexaff
Michael J. Pfenning, Eric Poisson

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsPoint particleMathematical physicsGravitationNabla symbolScalar (mathematics)Charge (physics)Scalar curvatureScalar fieldElectric chargeClassical mechanicsCurvatureSpacetimeQuantum mechanicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We calculate the self-force experienced by a point scalar charge $q,$ a point electric charge $e,$ and a point mass m moving in a weakly curved spacetime characterized by a time-independent Newtonian potential $\ensuremath{\Phi}.$ We assume that the matter distribution responsible for this potential is bounded, so that $\ensuremath{\Phi}\ensuremath{\sim}\ensuremath{-}M/r$ at large distances r from the matter, whose total mass is $M;$ otherwise, the Newtonian potential is left unspecified. (We use units in which $G=c=1.)$ The self-forces are calculated by first computing the retarded Green's functions for scalar, electromagnetic, and (linearized) gravitational fields in the weakly curved spacetime, and then evaluating an integral over the particle's past world line. The self-force typically contains both a conservative and a nonconservative (radiation-reaction) part. For the scalar charge, the conservative part of the self-force is equal to $2\ensuremath{\xi}{q}^{2}M\mathit{r}^{/r}^{3},$ where $\ensuremath{\xi}$ is a dimensionless constant measuring the coupling of the scalar field to the spacetime curvature, and $\mathit{r}^$ is a unit vector pointing in the radial direction. For the electric charge, the conservative part of the self-force is ${e}^{2}M\mathit{r}^{/r}^{3}.$ For the massive particle, the conservative force vanishes. For the scalar charge, the radiation-reaction force is $\frac{1}{3}{q}^{2}d\mathit{g}/dt,$ where $\mathit{g}=\ensuremath{-}\mathbf{\ensuremath{\nabla}}\ensuremath{\Phi}$ is the Newtonian gravitational field. For the electric charge, the radiation-reaction force is $\frac{2}{3}{e}^{2}d\mathit{g}/dt.$ For the massive particle, the radiation-reaction force is $\ensuremath{-}\frac{11}{3}{m}^{2}d\mathit{g}/dt.$ Our result for the gravitational self-force is disturbing: a radiation-reaction force should not appear in the equations of motion at this level of approximation, and it should certainly not give rise to radiation antidamping. In the last section of the paper we prove that while a massive particle in a vacuum spacetime is subjected only to its self-force, it is also subjected to a matter-mediated force when it moves in a spacetime that contains matter; this force originates from the changes in the matter distribution that are induced by the presence of the particle. We show that the matter-mediated force contains a radiation-damping term that precisely cancels out the antidamping contribution from the gravitational self-force. When both forces are combined, the equations of motion are conservative, and they agree with the appropriate limit of the standard post-Newtonian equations of motion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations78
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fieldsSame topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207