MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2048399603 · doi:10.7202/020740ar

Bilan statistique des lots de colonisation en Abitibi et au Témiscaminque (Québec)

2005· article· fr· W2048399603 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Louis‐Edmond Hamelin

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers de géographie du Québec · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Afin de fournir des états numériques récents, comparables et prélevés au même moment, un relevé détaillé a été entrepris au cours de l'été 1967 dans les quatre comtés de l’Abitibi de l'Ouest, l'Abitibi de l'Est, Rouyn-Noranda et Témiscamingue. L'ensemble du territoire, qui est situé dans le Pré-Nord, forme le Nord-Ouest du Québec méridional. La banque de lots qui ont été attribués atteint près de 20,000 unités ; sur ce nombre, 6,500 supportent une résidence et 2,000 sont convenablement cultivés. Un quart des fermes ont été abandonnées au cours des dernières années. Les valeurs varient grandement d'une paroisse à l'autre. Régionalement, le Témiscamingue constitue la meilleure région et Rouyn-Noranda la moins agricole. Au front pionnier, 5% seulement des unités d'exploitation sont des fermes gagne-pain. L'écoumène de colonisation n'est pas un écoumène-bloc. Dans une optique polyvalente, le réaménagement complet de l'espace abitibien constitue une tâche urgente.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers de géographie du Québec→Same topicAgriculture and Rural Development Research→French-language works237,207→