MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2048401875 · doi:10.1086/308427

Doppler Imaging of VW Cephei: Distribution and Evolution of Starspots on a Contact Binary

2000· article· en· W2048401875 on OpenAlexaff
Paul D. Hendry, S. W. Mochnacki

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStarspotPhysicsAstrophysicsSpotsPolarLight curveDifferential rotationContact binaryDoppler effectAsymmetryBinary starCold spotAstronomyStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present maximum entropy Doppler images of the contact binary VW Cephei, produced from seven data sets of simultaneous spectroscopic and photometric data at epochs from 1991 March to 1993 May. The geometric and orbital parameters of the contact binary were fitted, along with third-light characteristics, at the same time as spots, using both the spectroscopic and photometric data to constrain the models. The Doppler images indicated the presence of large polar spots on both components. The polar spot on the primary was about 50° in diameter and slightly off-center, similar to polar spots on other unevolved systems, while the polar spot on the secondary was 30° in diameter. A number of lower latitude features were also present. Spots were found to migrate around the primary component in the same direction as the orbital motion of the system. Slow differential rotation of the primary component was observed, with spots at higher latitudes moving at higher angular rates. The spot distribution on the secondary appeared to be quite stable, with spots congregating at active longitudes, and with no organized pattern of migration. The spot coverage on both components was extremely high, though not unrealistic compared to spot coverages of some RS CVn systems. Spots covered 66% of the surface area of the primary and 55% of the secondary. The spot coverage was much greater than that suggested by asymmetry of the light curves. Our Doppler images were modeled in agreement with the Mullan starspot model. However, they also explained the success of the hot secondary model, since the bolometric flux-weighted mean surface temperature of the primary was less than that of the secondary, owing to the large numbers of nonblack spots. The models indicated the presence of a great number of unresolved spots. We discuss the implications of this to the field of Doppler imaging and argue in favor of the use of two-temperature photosphere models for the Doppler imaging of all rapidly rotating systems. We detected three flares at Hα and estimate that one such detectable flare occurs on VW Cep every 35 ± 20 hr. We also noted that the distribution of chromospheric emission at Hα over the primary of VW Cep may vary from epoch to epoch.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→