MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048429679 · doi:10.1021/jo8002503

Unsymmetric Pyrrole, Thiophene, and Furan-Conjugated Comonomers Prepared Using Azomethine Connections: Potential New Monomers for Alternating Homocoupled Products

2008· article· en· W2048429679 on OpenAlexaff
Stéphane Dufresne, W. G. Skene

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Electronics and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsBombardier (Canada)Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThiopheneChemistryPyrroleFuranIntersystem crossingConjugated systemPhotochemistryMonomerSinglet stateQuenching (fluorescence)Excited stateAnnuleneTriplet stateInternal conversionPolymer chemistryPolymerStereochemistryMoleculeOrganic chemistryFluorescence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unsymmetric comonomers consisting of thiophene, pyrrole, and furan heterocycles were prepared using azomethine bonds. Photophysical investigation of the novel pi-donor-donor-donor segmented compounds revealed that their singlet excited state is only partially deactivated by internal conversion unlike their all-thiophene azomethine analogues. Temperature-dependent steady-state and time-resolved emission studies demonstrated that the unsymmetric compounds deactivated efficiently their singlet excited state by intersystem crossing to populate the triplet manifold. This lower energy state is rapidly deactivated by nonradiative self-quenching. The comonomers and their anodically prepared conjugated homocoupled products are both electrochemically active, resulting in new compounds that can be mutually oxidized and reduced. Meanwhile, the oxidation potentials of the coupled products are shifted by up to 400 mV to more cathodic potentials relative to their corresponding comonomers, confirming their increased degree of conjugation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.728

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Organic ChemistrySame topicOrganic Electronics and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207