MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048435949 · doi:10.2118/03-01-04

Impacts of Initial Gas-to-Oil Ratio (GOR) on SAGD Operations

2003· article· en· W2048435949 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNuclear Physics
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringSteam-assisted gravity drainageSteam injectionGas oil ratioOil viscosityEnvironmental scienceAPI gravityLight crude oilDiffusionOil fieldViscosityWaste managementEngineeringOil sandsGeologyMaterials scienceThermodynamicsCrude oilPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study addresses the important role of initial gas-to-oil ratio (GOR) in steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) operations. A numerical model using CMG's STARS was validated through history matching of laboratory experiments conducted at the Alberta Research Council. The impacts of initial GOR on process performance were then studied using field scale numerical simulations. The results indicate that high initial GOR may have beneficial effects, namely, reduction of oil viscosity, and improvement of the oil-to-steam ratio (OSR). A detrimental impact, however, is also shown as the gas impedes the rate of steam chamber growth, and hence reduces oil production rates. Further analysis indicated that this is because of a "dynamic vacuum" effect due to steam condensation at the front of the steam chamber. This dynamic vacuum effect dominates the diffusion process and creates a gas-rich zone at the front of the steam chamber, thereby resisting further growth of the steam chamber and slowing oil production. The same effect occurred when noncondensable gas was co-injected with steam in either live oil or dead oil reservoirs. This study addresses the important role of initial gas-to-oil ratio (GOR) in steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) operations. A numerical model using CMG's STARS was validated through history matching of laboratory experiments conducted at the Alberta Research Council. The impacts of initial GOR on process performance were then studied using field scale numerical simulations. The results indicate that high initial GOR may have beneficial effects, namely, reduction of oil viscosity, and improvement of the oil-to-steam ratio (OSR). A detrimental impact, however, is also shown as the gas impedes the rate of steam chamber growth, and hence reduces oil production rates. Further analysis indicated that this is because of a "dynamic vacuum" effect due to steam condensation at the front of the steam chamber. This dynamic vacuum effect dominates the diffusion process and creates a gas-rich zone at the front of the steam chamber, thereby resisting further growth of the steam chamber and slowing oil production. The same effect occurred when noncondensable gas was co-injected with steam in either live oil or dead oil reservoirs. Introduction It is generally assumed that when the steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) process is applied to a heavy oil reservoir with a high initial gas-to-oil ratio (GOR), there is better production than for a reservoir with a low initial GOR. This is a fairly common assumption for good reasons; the mobility of live oil in porous media is usually higher(1) than that of dead oil. The present numerical study was initiated to investigate this assumption. The approach involves the history match of 1D laboratory tests and field scale simulations. The history match was used to verify the numerical techniques and to provide reliable parameters for the use of field scale simulations. The results support the commonly believed assumption of viscosity reduction in 1D live/dead oil experiments. In field scale simulations, production predictions were compared for reservoirs with different initial GORs. There were additional effects beyond viscosity reduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.771
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it