Du projet à la promesse. Analyse syntaxique et critique de la forme de Genèse 12,1-3 et 12,7
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article vise à démontrer que la péricope de Gn 12,1-3 est non pas une promesse, comme il est généralement admis, mais un projet dont la réalisation implique la participation de Dieu, d'Abraham et des familles de la terre. Une analyse syntaxique et une critique de la forme montre que la promesse divine n'apparait que dans le verset 7. Les w.1-3 présentent plutôt un projet à deux volets dont chacun est introduit par un impératif. Les formes verbales et la construction grammaticale qui suit chacune des injonctions expriment la volonté divine. Ayant obéi au premier impératif, Abraham recoit alors la promesse (v. 7) qui assure la réalisation du premier volet du projet. Il demeure aux descendants d'Abraham d'obéir au deuxieme impératif pour que s'accomplisse l'ensemble du projet divin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".