MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048505101 · doi:10.1039/b403188a

Reversible photocyclization of achiral dithienylperfluorocyclopentene dopants in a ferroelectric liquid crystal: bistable SSFLC photoswitching

2004· article· en· W2048505101 on OpenAlexafffund
Kenneth E. Maly, Peng Zhang, Michael Wand, Erwin Buncel, Robert P. Lemieux

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDopantFerroelectricityBistabilityLiquid crystalMaterials scienceOrthorhombic crystal systemDopingPolarization (electrochemistry)PhotochemistryCrystallographyChemistryCrystal structureOptoelectronicsPhysical chemistryDielectric

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The spontaneous polarization (PS) of a ferroelectric liquid crystal is modulated reversibly by photocyclization (λ = 313 nm) of dithienyl- and dibenzothienylperfluorocyclopentene dopants with relatively high aspect ratios. Photocyclization of these dopants causes a decrease of PS due to a photomechanical effect which may originate from a loss of conformational flexibility of the dopant upon photocyclization. The degree of PS photomodulation increases with dopant concentration up to the solubility limit of 3 mol%. The maximum polarization photomodulation, ΔPS = 16.2 nC cm−2, is achieved at 6 K below the Curie point with the dopant 1,2-bis(5-(4-heptyloxyphenyl)-2-methylthien-3-yl)perfluorocyclopentene (3c, 3 mol%). The resulting PS photoswitch is fatigue resistant and photochemically bistable. Polarized spectroscopy experiments suggest that the dopants form homogeneous solutions with the FLC host and are integrated within the layer structure of the SmC* phase, with their molecular long axes approximately coincident with the director. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of a bistable ferroelectric liquid crystal photoswitch to be reported in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Materials ChemistrySame topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207