<i>Puccinia acroptili</i> on Russian Knapweed in Colorado, Montana, and Wyoming
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acroptilon repens (L.) DC. (Russian knapweed) is a long-lived perennial weed from central Asia that is widely distributed in the western United States (U.S.). Recently, accessions of a rust disease were collected from Colorado (CO), Montana (MT), and Wyoming (WY) for comparison with Eurasian isolates. U.S. accessions had two-celled teliospores with slight constrictions in the middle and urediniospores with three germ pores ± equatorial in location. Urediniospores were (state, width × length, [n = 100]): CO, 16.4 to 25.7 × 19.2 to 27.0 μm; MT, 18.4 to 23.1 × 17.4 to 24.6 μm; and WY, 18.0 to 26.2 × 20.2 to 26.7 μm. These were similar to those of 16.6 to 25.7 × 21.2 to 28.0 μm from two New Mexican (NM) herbarium specimens (BPI Nos. 1107952 and 1110177) (1). Teliospores measured 19.9 to 27.7 × 29.8 to 47.4 μm, 17.4 to 26.0 × 32.4 to 44.2 μm, 16.5 to 27.5 × 29.4 to 45.7 μm, and 18.7 to 27.6 × 31.0 to 46.4 μm for CO, MT, WY, and NM accessions, respectively. These rust isolates have been identified as Puccinia acroptili Syd. on the basis of host plant record and spore morphology (2). To our knowledge, this is the first record of P. acroptili in CO, MT, and WY. Besides NM, P. acroptili has been reported in North America from California, British Columbia, and Saskatchewan. References: (1) M. E. Palm and S. G. Vesper. Plant Dis. 75:1075, 1991. (2) D. B. O. Savile. Can. J. Bot. 48:1567, 1970.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".