MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048655509 · doi:10.1159/000200377

Effect of Diabetes in the BB Wistar Rat on the Peptidergic Component of the Enteric Innervation

2009· article· en· W2048655509 on OpenAlexaff
A.M.J. Buchan

Bibliographic record

VenueDigestion · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalaninInternal medicineEndocrinologySomatostatinNeuropeptideVasoactive intestinal peptideSubstance PMyenteric plexusCalcitoninSubmucous plexusCalcitonin gene-related peptideNeuropeptide Y receptorMedicineBiologyImmunohistochemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Whole mount preparations of the small intestine from Wistar, normoglycemic 90-day diabetic BB, hyperglycemic 90-day diabetic BB and age-matched nondiabetic BB rats were immunostained to determine the extent of the peptidergic innervation. The neuropeptides examined were vasoactive intestinal peptide, neuropeptide Y, substance P. calcitonin gene-related peptide, galanin and somatostatin. The extent of the peptidergic innervation in the submucous and myenteric plexuses from the control Wistar, nondiabetic BB and normoglycemic diabetic BB rats was identical. In the submucous plexus of the hyperglycemic diabetic BB rats there was a marked reduction in the number of somatostatin-immunoreactive neurons and nerve fibres. Substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide which are colocalized in a proportion of the somatostatin neurons were unaffected. In the myenteric plexus of the hyperglycemic diabetic BB rats the number and intensity of staining of the galanin-immunoreactive nerve fibers was markedly increased. Galanin has not been observed to colocalize with any of the other neuropeptides examined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.332
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigestionSame topicNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207