Biphenyl uptake by psychrotolerant<i>Pseudomonas</i>sp. strain Cam-1 and mesophilic<i>Burkholderia</i>sp. strain LB400
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigated the uptake of biphenyl by the psychrotolerant, polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)-degrader, Pseudomonas sp. strain Cam-1 and the mesophilic PCB-degrader, Burkholderia sp. strain LB400. The effects of growth substrates, metabolic inhibitors, and temperature on [14C]biphenyl uptake were studied. Biphenyl uptake by both strains was induced by growth on biphenyl, and was inhibited by dinitrophenol (DNP) and carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP), which are metabolic uncouplers. The Vmax and Km for biphenyl uptake by Cam-1 at 22 degrees C were 5.4 +/- 1.7 nmol x min(-1) x (mg of cell protein)(-1) and 83.1 +/- 15.9 micromol x L(-1), respectively. The Vmax and Km for biphenyl uptake by LB400 at 22 degrees C were 3.2 +/- 0.3 nmol x min(-1) x (mg of cell protein(-1)) and 51.5 +/- 9.6 micromol x L(-1), respectively. At 15 degrees C, the maximum rate for biphenyl uptake by Cam-1 and LB400 was 3.1 +/- 0.3 nmol x min(-1) x (mg of cell protein)(-1) and 0.89 +/- 0.1 nmol x min(-1) x (mg of cell protein)(-1), respectively. Thus, the maximum rate for biphenyl uptake by Cam-1 at 15 degrees C was more than 3 times higher than that for LB400.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".