MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mathematical Modeling of a Solar Passive Cooling System Using a Parabolic Concentrator

2013· article· en· W204868852 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ghassan Tashtoush, Omar R. Al Farah, Hazem H. Kawasmi

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy science and technology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSolar Energy Systems and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolar chimneyConcentratorEnvironmental scienceRelative humidityChimney (locomotive)ThermalMeteorologyMechanical engineeringEngineeringSolar energyPhysicsElectrical engineeringInlet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study a mathematical simulation of a system that is driven by a solar chimney equipped with Parabolic Solar Concentrator (PSC) in order to cool buildings by using an Evaporative Cooling Cavity (ECC). The Capability of the system to meet the standards and requirements has been considered in order for this study to be applicable in many fields (residential, industrial or agricultural). Mathematical modeling and simulation were performed to illustrate the effect of changing parameters regarding geometry and dimensions, ambient temperature, relative humidity, heat and mass transfer rate and others. The solar chimney has been designed by using parabolic solar concentrator to increase the efficiency of this system.The simulation showed that the system is capable of providing good temperature reduction even with low solar intensity (200 W/m²). It was found that the system could be used for residential and agricultural applications to provide thermal comfort conditions in hot air and dry climates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy science and technologySame topicSolar Energy Systems and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207