Opposing regulatory roles of phosphorylation and acetylation in DNA mispair processing by thymine DNA glycosylase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CpG dinucleotides are mutational hotspots associated with cancer and genetic diseases. Thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG) plays an integral role in CpG maintenance by excising mispaired thymine and uracil in a CpG context and also participates in transcriptional regulation via gene-specific CpG demethylation and functional interactions with the transcription machinery. Here, we report that protein kinase C alpha (PKCalpha) interacts with TDG and phosphorylates amino-terminal serine residues adjacent to lysines acetylated by CREB-binding protein (CBP) and p300 (CBP/p300). We establish that acetylation and phosphorylation are mutually exclusive, and their interplay dramatically alters the DNA mispair-processing functions of TDG. Remarkably, acetylation of the amino-terminal region abrogates high-affinity DNA binding and selectively prevents processing of G:T mispairs. In contrast, phosphorylation does not markedly alter DNA interactions, but may preserve G:T processing in vivo by preventing CBP-mediated acetylation. Mutational analysis suggests that the acetyl-acceptor lysines are not directly involved in contacting DNA, but may constitute a conformationally sensitive interface that modulates DNA interactions. These findings reveal opposing roles of CBP/p300 and PKCalpha in regulating the DNA repair functions of TDG and suggest that the interplay of these modifications in vivo may be critically important in the maintenance of CpG dinucleotides and epigenetic regulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".