MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048733777 · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2013.02.018

The control of spindle length by Hsp70 and Hsp110 molecular chaperones

2013· review· en· W2048733777 on OpenAlexafffund
Taras Makhnevych, Walid A. Houry

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Letters · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHeat shock proteins research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsHsp70Cell biologyChaperone (clinical)BiologySubfamilyMolecular motorHeat shock proteinHsp90GeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Molecular chaperones are an essential group of proteins required to maintain proper protein homeostasis in the cell and include Hsp40, Hsp60, Hsp70, Hsp90, and Hsp100 among others. Hsp110 proteins form a subfamily of the Hsp70 family and seem to primarily function as nucleotide exchange factors for the Hsp70s. Data to date suggest that Hsp110 together with Hsp70 are required to ensure proper spindle assembly and nuclear distribution during cell division. More specifically, we propose that an Hsp110-Hsp70 complex modulates the activity and directionality of the kinesin-5 motor, Cin8, which is required for spindle elongation. The modulation of spindle length by molecular chaperones might be a mechanism by which cell division can be controlled especially under proteostatic stress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS LettersSame topicHeat shock proteins researchFrench-language works237,207