MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048735999 · doi:10.1116/1.3523470

Fluorescence microscopy investigations of ligand propagation and accessibility under adherent cells

2010· article· en· W2048735999 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiointerphases · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsFluorophoreBiophysicsFluorescence microscopeFibronectinFluorescenceConfocal microscopyBasement membraneMembraneAlexa FluorChemistryTotal internal reflection fluorescence microscopeExtracellular matrixEpidermal growth factorMicroscopyLigand (biochemistry)Cell biologyReceptorBiologyBiochemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fluorescence microscopy methods including total internal reflection fluorescence and confocal laser scanning microscopy have played a major role in modern cell biology research by permitting imaging of fluorescently tagged macromolecules in living cells. These methods are often used to examine the initial events in signal transduction, which involve interactions occurring between membrane receptors and ligands such as antibodies and growth factors. Most quantitative biophysical applications using these fluorescence imaging methods, including ligand binding assays, are based on the assumption that the fluorophore label of interest has equal access to all areas of the membrane on the cell. Our findings suggest that there is limited accessibility of fluorophores (25±2%)(-) under the basal membrane of adherent CHO-K1 cells expressing epidermal growth factor receptor plated on a bare glass in standard two-dimensional tissue cultures. The authors present a detailed study of the extent to which a small fluorescent dye molecule (Alexa 647) is able to propagate under the basal membrane of cells plated on a variety of biologically compatible substrates: fibronectin, bovine serum albumin, poly-d-lysine, collagen I, collagen IV, Geltrex™, and fibronectin such as binding polymer. For nonspecific dye propagation the best overall accessibility was achieved using a thin layer preparation of a commercially available basement membrane matrix, Geltrex™ (67±8%). Coupling of a specific high affinity ligand (epidermal growth factor) to the dye did result in a moderate increase in propagation for most substrates examined. Despite the overall increase in propagation for most substrates (60%-80%), large areas under the central regions of the adherent cells still remained inaccessible to the fluorescently labeled ligand. More importantly, the presence of the specific ligand did not result in consistent increase in ligand propagation. Taken together these results suggest that the reduced accessibility is not exclusively due to steric effects, and the chemistry of both the ligand and the substrate may be important when working under conditions of reduced dimensionality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.304

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it