Bacteriology of the Sinus Cavities of Asymptomatic Individuals after Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the resident flora and the level of bacterial presence of the healthy sinus cavity post-endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). SETTING: University-based prospective trial. METHOD: Subjects included asymptomatic patients who had undergone ESS for inflammatory disease more than 12 weeks previously. Endoscopic cultures of the sinus cavities were performed with swab and a novel lavage technique and were processed for identification of bacterial species and the level of bacterial presence. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were recruited. Bacterial organisms were recovered in 97% of subjects (mean 1.5 organisms/patient). The flora predominantly consisted of coagulase-negative staphylococci (69%) and diphtheroids (25%). Staphylococcus aureus was recovered in 31% of subjects and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 3% only. No gram-negative rods were recovered in any individual. The Gram stains of 29 individuals were identified; 20 (69%) had no white blood cells, 9 (31%) had 1+ white blood cells, and none had >1 white blood cells. All quantitative lavage fluid cultures were negative at the 10(4) detection level. CONCLUSION: Coagulase-negative staphylococci, diphtheroids, and S. aureus constitute the predominant flora of the healthy post-ESS sinus cavity and probably represent colonization of the cavity by nasal flora from the contiguous nasal mucosa. These data offer a basis for interpreting sinus cultures obtained in symptomatic patients after ESS. S. aureus may be frequently recovered in asymptomatic patients; thus, not all instances of S. aureus recovery on culture require therapy. Future testing of individuals with this organism will probably have to be modified to better assess factors associated with pathogenicity, such as bacterial load, biofilm formation, or superantigen production. In contrast, gram-negative rods and P. aeruginosa should probably be treated when identified on culture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".