Bibliographic record
Abstract
En faisant intervenir les théories pragmatiques de l'ironie, l'article interroge les modalités de constitution de l'élément ironique dans le Pleurer-Rire, roman contemporain de l'écrivain congolais Henri Lopès. Il s'agit ici de mettre en évidence le symbolisme discursif de l'ironie dans l'écriture de Lopès, en analysant le rapport du roman à son contexte socio-discursif de production et d'intelligibilité - le " Pleurer-Rire " du roman africain post-colonial - et ses modalités formelles d'intégration de l'élément ironique. Au terme de cette analyse, nous avons pu formuler un certain nombre d'hypothèses quant au symbolisme discursif du recours à l'ironie chez Lopès, hypothèses qui, au demeurant, en appellent non seulement au rapport de l'écrivain au pouvoir politique duquel il participe et qu'il met en écriture, mais encore à son rapport à l'institution littéraire négro-africaine francophone : d'une part, une stratégie défensive qui prend la forme de l'autocensure, d'autre part une stratégie offensive qui tend à relativiser le discours sur les spécificités de la littérature négro-africaine post-coloniale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".