MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048807346 · doi:10.1139/v09-123

Cowaxanthone F, a new tetraoxygenated xanthone, and other anti-inflammatory and antioxidant compounds from Garcinia cowa

2009· article· en· W2048807346 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kanda Panthong, Nongporn Hutadilok‐Towatana, Ampai Panthong

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNatural Compound Pharmacology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsXanthoneChemistryDPPHAntioxidantGarciniaClusiaceaeTraditional medicineStereochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new tetraoxygenated xanthone, cowaxanthone F (1), as well as four known compounds, morelloflavone (2), volkensiflavone (3), morelloflavone-7″-O-glucoside (fukugiside, 4), and 1,6-dihydroxyxanthone (5), were isolated from the crude acetone extract of the twigs of Garcinia cowa (Guttiferae). All compounds (1–5) were tested for antioxidant activity against DPPH (diphenylpicrylhydrazyl), hydroxyl, and superoxide radicals; only morelloflavone (2) and morelloflavone-7″-O-glucoside (4) exhibited high potency. Eight tetraoxygenated xanthones from the fruits of G. cowa , cowaxanthones A–D (6–9), cowanin (15), α-mangostin (16), mangostanin (17), and cowanol (18), were also investigated for anti-inflammatory activity using ethyl phenylpropiolate (EPP)-induced ear edema. Assessment at 30, 60, and 120 min revealed that cowaxanthones B–D (7–9), cowanin (15), and α-mangostin (16) exhibited significant anti-inflammatory activity when compared to phenylbutazone, while cowaxanthone A (6), mangostanin (17), and cowanol (18) showed less activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicNatural Compound Pharmacology StudiesFrench-language works237,207