MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048809268 · doi:10.1145/2815347.2815359

Spectrum Access Quality for Mobile Broadband Video Communications in Smart Cities

2015· article· en· W2048809268 on OpenAlexaff
Omneya Issa, Wei Li, Hong Liu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVideo qualityComputer networkWireless broadbandWireless networkMobile broadbandBroadbandAccess networkBroadband networksTelecommunicationsIMT AdvancedWirelessMultimediaMobile computingMobile technologyMobile WebEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cities use broadband wireless spectrum access technologies to enable a wide range of smart city applications that enhance safety and security, improve efficiency of municipal services and promote a better quality of life for residents and visitors. The most quality and bandwidth-demanding smart city scenarios usually involve video communications. New compression technologies have made the delivery of high-resolution video over access networks a reality. However, video delivery must take into account network characteristics in different environmental conditions. This paper studies the possibility of providing high resolution video in mobile environments over the downlink and uplink of a broadband wireless access network, without compromising the video quality. The downlink scenario typically corresponds to offering multicast/unicast video to mobile residents and visitors, whereas the uplink scenario can be for video surveillance for public safety and electronic news gathering. For this study, measurements were obtained using professional video streaming equipment, on a commercially available broadband wireless access system in a typical emulated mobile environment. Analysis was done for different video settings and spectrum and network configurations in order to characterize network performance and assess video quality in different conditions. A key outcome of this analysis was to determine the feasibility of high resolution video delivery over broadband wireless access networks in mobile conditions and to point recommendations for the QoE optimization of mobile video reception. A good quality of experience is possible provided that system and environment limitations are respected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.207
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207