MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Complete dentures and oral health‐related quality of life – do coping styles matter?

2004· article· en· W2048832324 on OpenAlexaff
Guido Heydecke, Lisa A. Tedesco, Charles J. Kowalski, Marita R. Inglehart

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunity Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Health and Care Utilization
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDenturesCoping (psychology)DenialDisengagement theoryDentistryQuality of life (healthcare)Clinical psychologyGerontologyPsychologyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNLABELLED: Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQOL) in edentulous patients with complete dentures is often impaired. This paper investigates the effect of different coping styles on OHRQOL. PURPOSE: (a) To assess OHRQOL of edentulous patients with conventional complete dentures, and (b) to investigate if individual differences in these patients' styles of coping with stress affect their OHRQOL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from 249 fully edentulous patients with complete dentures (mean age: 66.0 years) who responded to a mailed survey (adjusted response rate: 48.8%). OHRQOL was measured with the 14-item short form of the oral health impact profile (OHIP). Ratings of coping strategies were obtained using the 28-item Brief COPE, an instrument measuring various styles of coping with stress. Linear regression analyses were used to explore the relationships between coping styles, background variables such as age, gender, income, and age of prosthesis, and the patients' OHRQOL. RESULTS: About 35% of the respondents reported impacts from their oral conditions on their overall OHRQOL (OHIP-14 total score) occasionally, fairly often, or often. Physical pain was even more prevalent, with 53.3% of the respondents reporting pain impacts. The linear regression model (P < 0.0001) explained 31.1% of the variation in the OHIP-14 total score. The coping variables instrumental support, behavioral disengagement, substance abuse, denial, and religion were significant negative predictors of OHRQOL. Only emotional support was a significant positive predictor of OHRQOL. CONCLUSION: Wearing conventional complete dentures has a significant impact on OHRQOL. This impact is moderated by the styles a patient uses to cope with stress. Using emotional support has a positive effect on OHRQOL, while other coping styles, namely instrumental support, behavioral disengagement, substance abuse, denial, and religion are significant negative predictors of OHRQOL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.146
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations99
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunity Dentistry And Oral EpidemiologySame topicDental Health and Care UtilizationFrench-language works237,207