MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048850738 · doi:10.1097/iio.0b013e31824b442c

Management of Astigmatism

2012· review· en· W2048850738 on OpenAlex
Clara C. Chan, Edward J. Holland

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Ophthalmology Clinics · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntraocular Surgery and Lenses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOptometryEquity (law)For profitOphthalmologyBusinessFinancePolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Disclosure: Clara C. Chan is not on any Advisory Boards and has not consulted for any companies in the last 12 months. She has received travel and honorarium for speaking at meetings supported by Allergan in the last 12 months. She has no stocks, equity, and contract of employment or named position within any for-profit company. Edward J. Holland is on the Advisory Boards for Alcon Laboratories and has consulted to Abbott Medical Optics, Advanced Vision Research Inc., Alcon Laboratories, Allergan, Bausch & Lomb, Inspire Pharmaceuticals, Ocusoft, QLT Phototherapeutics Inc., Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., and Wavetec Vision Systems Inc. in the last 12 months. He has received travel and honorarium for speaking at meetings supported by Allergan, Bausch & Lomb and Alcon Laboratories Inc. as well in the last 12 months. He has no stocks, equity, and contract of employment or named position within any for-profit company.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it