Maternal Inflammatory Response in Severe Preeclamptic and Preeclamptic Pregnancies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to use serum levels of IL-6, IL-8, IL-1β, TNF-α, CD40L and HSCRP as an in vitro inflammatory stimulus in order to profile the inflammatory response of whole blood from pregnant women with preeclampsia and severe preeclampsia, and to determine whether this functional response fits with imbalance. Methods: The preeclampsia group (n = 27) and severe preeclampsia group (n = 21) were generated by matching the diagnostic criteria of the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). Control group (n = 21) was matched for gestational stage, maternal age, and parity. The panel of cytokines analyzed included interleukin IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α, HSCRP, CD40L for all groups. Results: There were statistically high values of IL-6 (P < 0.003) and TNF-α (P < 0.003) at preeclampsia group versus control group, the significantly high values of IL-6 (P < 0.001) and IL-1β (P < 0.005) was found at the severe preeclampsia group versus control group. There were no significant difference between the groups of preeclampsia and severe preeclampsia for IL-6, IL-8, IL-1β, TNF-α, CD40L and HSCRP. Conclusion: Increasing gestational age in normal pregnancy features an increased inflammatory responsiveness, which is potentially a preparatory mechanism for maternal sensitivity to the fetal triggers of labour. This increase in response is mirrored by women with preeclampsia, highlighting the importance of stratifying patients according to the timing the onset of disease given their inherent differences in inflammatory function. It is important to know determinative factors for changing preeclampsia to severe preeclampsia. Increased level of IL-6 and TNF-α may play on the role of triggering factors for preeclampsia and severe preeclampsia. So it must be studied to be determining cut off value of these parameters. doi:10.4021/jcgo44w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".