MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048871671 · doi:10.7202/1009099ar

La réfection de l’axe routier 73/175 : son histoire, son déroulement et ses enjeux sociaux et écologiques

2012· article· fr· W2048871671 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Yves Bédard

Bibliographic record

VenueLe Naturaliste canadien · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyPopulationForestryMedicineArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’axe routier 73/175 qui relie Québec à Saguenay a été mis en service en 1948. Avec les années, les problèmes de sécurité routière grandissants et les pressions exercées par la population ont provoqué la mise en chantier d’une route à 2 chaussées séparées. À la suite d’une étude d’impact, les enjeux environnementaux du projet ont été identifiés, à savoir : l’impact social du déplacement de 83 résidences, l’impact des travaux sur la population d’omble de fontaine (Salvelinus fontinalis) et son habitat et l’impact de la fragmentation des habitats de la faune terrestre par le nouveau corridor autoroutier. Une série de mesures ont été mises en place pour réduire ces impacts, tel un programme de surveillance et de suivi environnemental (dont des suivis sur l’omble de fontaine, la grande faune et la petite faune), l’aménagement de passages et de clôtures pour la faune et des outils de contrôle de l’érosion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.174

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLe Naturaliste canadienSame topicWildlife-Road Interactions and ConservationFrench-language works237,207