MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048880726 · doi:10.1029/2003gl018838

A fully coupled constitutive model for thermo‐hydro‐mechanical analysis in elastic media with double porosity

2003· article· en· W2048880726 on OpenAlexaff
Nasser Khalili, A. P. S. Selvadurai

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanicsHeat fluxConstitutive equationConservation lawDarcy's lawPorous mediumIsothermal processPartial differential equationPorosityFluid dynamicsMaterials scienceConservation of massHeat transferThermodynamicsPhysicsFinite element methodComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The partial differential equations governing non‐isothermal flow and deformation in an elastic medium with double porosity are presented. The governing equations satisfy an effective stress concept, Darcy's law, Fourier' law and the equations of Hookean thermoelasticity. The equations are derived using a systematic macroscopic approach that satisfies conservation laws applicable to balance of linear momentum, mass and energy. The Thermo‐Hydro‐Mechanical coupling take into account processes associated with: thermal expansion, thermal convection by moving fluid, fluid flux due to temperature gradients, heat flux due to pressure gradients, fluid and heat exchange between the two pore system, and the heat of phase compression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations137
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207