MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048890227 · doi:10.1089/vim.2009.0084

Changes in Function of HIV-Specific T-Cell Responses with Increasing Time from Infection

2010· article· en· W2048890227 on OpenAlexaff
Michel L. Ndongala, Philomena Kamya, Salix Boulet, Yoav Peretz, Danielle Rouleau, Cécile Tremblay, Roger LeBlanc, Pierre Côté, Jean-Guy Baril, Réjean Thomas, Sylvie Vézina, Mohamed Rachid Boulassel, Jean‐Pierre Routy, Rafick‐Pierre Sékaly, Nicole F. Bernard

Bibliographic record

VenueViral Immunology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsRoyal Victoria HospitalClinique Paro ExcellenceCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversité de MontréalMcGill University Health Centre
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institutes of HealthStyrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete
KeywordsELISPOTInterferon gammaSecretionCD8ImmunologyImmune systemBiologyT cellHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)VirologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently HIV-infected individuals have virus-specific responses characterized by IFN-gamma/IL-2 secretion and proliferation rarely seen in chronic infection. To investigate the timing of loss of HIV-specific T-cell function, we screened cells from 59 treatment-naïve HIV-infected individuals with known dates of infection for proteome-wide responses secreting IFN-gamma/IL-2 and IFN-gamma alone by ELISPOT. HIV peptide-specific proliferation was assessed by carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE) dilution. The contribution of IFN-gamma/IL-2 and IFN-gamma-only secretion to the total HIV-specific response was compared in subjects infected <6, 6-12, and 12-36 mo earlier. The frequency of IFN-gamma/IL-2-secreting cells fell, while that of IFN-gamma-only secretion rose with time from infection. HIV peptide-specific proliferative responses were almost exclusively mediated by CD8(+) T cells, and were significantly lower in cells obtained from the 12-36 mo versus < 6 mo post-infection groups. By the second year of infection there was a significant difference in these functions compared to those assessed within 6 mo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueViral ImmunologySame topicHIV Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207