Bibliographic record
Abstract
HE term liinetochore (= movement place; SHARP, 1934) is used in T this paper to mean the specialized region of the clironiosonir~ wlicre tlie property of active riiobility on the spindle is manifested irrespective o f the number or extension of these regions in the clironiosoin(' body and of other properties tliat may be associated with tho region of active mobility.The expression localized hinetocliore is uwd when a single region is present in tlie clironiosoine body which manifests the property ot active mobility in conjunction with the property of a special cycle of division.The expres4ons diffuse and multiple liinetochores, respectivcly, arc' uwti to iimin the apparent distribution of tlie property of active mobility tlirougliout tlie whole body of the clironiosonie, and the existence ol' sevc.r:rldistinct regions in the cliroinosoine body t1i:i t have this property.TIic, propchrty of a special cycle of division c m n o t :ilways be recognized in llie first of these types.The term non-localizcd kinetochore i k , u s d when the type of kinetochore found is not a localized one, h i t when it may or m a y not be of the diffuse type.The term centromere is used as a syiionyni 01 localired ltinctochorcl bec:~use it has almost acquired this meaning in the literature.B r G h the term centroniere (understood a5 R region which is the cenlrc. of tlic forccs responsible for [he chromosome beliaviour during divisii bn) is mainly :I term having a genetic significance.Thus, tlie crossing-over per unit cytological length near the centroniere ic, 1owt.rthan elsewhere.'I'lit.term centromere lacks the universality necessary to embrace all tlic wgions in question.These regions havc~ in coniinon only one property.llic propcrty of active mobility, and among tlie existing terms, kinctocliorcmovenient placeis the one which expre\ses best tlih plienonivnon.It has the advantage that it docs not iniply tlie existence ol' any specialized ))organ)) or ))body)) at this region of the chromoso~ne, arid it is independent of the structure of tlie region in question.I do not, Iiowevor, consider it an ideal term, but, as it is fairly good for the expo4tion 5 0 l l l C body.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".