MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048899335 · doi:10.2753/pke0160-3477320103

Keynes and the real world: Davidson, money, and uncertainty

2009· article· en· W2048899335 on OpenAlex
Virginie Monvoisin, Louis-Philipe Rochon

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Post Keynesian Economics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Theory and Policy
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsPost-Keynesian economicsKeynesian economicsTRACE (psycholinguistics)Focus (optics)New Keynesian economicsNeoclassical economicsPositive economicsMonetary policyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we show that there are many similarities between the economics of Paul Davidson and the views expressed by the monetary circuit. This is not surprising because they both trace their roots to Keynes. Circuitists emphasize banks and uncertainty; Davidson places the focus on uncertainty, contracts, and money. We seek to show that both approaches are complementary on many levels and offer in fact simply different pieces of the same overall Post Keynesian puzzle. In the end, they both find their inspiration in Keynes, which is still relevant today, as exemplified in Davidson's new book, John Maynard Keynes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score0.734

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it