MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Boosting Regulatory T Cells Limits Neuroinflammation in Permanent Cortical Stroke

2013· article· en· W2048903425 on OpenAlexaff
Arthur Liesz, Wei Zhou, Shin-Young Na, Günter J. Hämmerling, Natalio Garbi, Simone Karcher, Éva Mracskó, Johannes Backs, Serge Rivest, Roland Veltkamp

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsNeuroinflammationNeuroprotectionTrichostatin AProinflammatory cytokineFOXP3Histone deacetylasePharmacologyCytokineIn vivoMicrogliaMedicineImmunologyImmune systemNeuroscienceInflammationBiologyHistone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inflammatory mechanisms contribute substantially to secondary tissue injury after brain ischemia. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are key endogenous modulators of postischemic neuroinflammation. We investigated the potential of histone deacetylase inhibition (HDACi) to enhance Treg potency for experimental stroke in mice. HDACi using trichostatin A increased the number of Tregs and boosted their immunosuppressive capacity and interleukin (IL)-10 expression. In vivo treatment reduced infarct volumes and behavioral deficits after cortical brain ischemia, attenuated cerebral proinflammatory cytokine expression, and increased numbers of brain-invading Tregs. A similar effect was obtained using tubastatin, a specific inhibitor of HDAC6 and a key HDAC in Foxp3 regulation. The neuroprotective effect of HDACi depended on the presence of Foxp3(+) Tregs, and in vivo and in vitro studies showed that the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 was their main mediator. In summary, modulation of Treg function by HDACi is a novel and potent target to intervene at the center of neuroinflammation. Furthermore, this novel concept of modulating endogenous immune mechanisms might be translated to a broad spectrum of diseases, including primary neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.694

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations224
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeuroscienceSame topicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsFrench-language works237,207