Inositol (1,4,5)Trisphosphate Metabolism and Enhanced Calcium Mobilization in Airway Smooth Muscle of Hyperresponsive Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) is a phenotype of asthma and can be modeled by the inbred Fisher strain of rat, which is hyperresponsive in vivo relative to the Lewis strain. Enhanced airway smooth muscle (ASM) contractility and Ca(2+) mobilization are associated with the AHR observed in Fisher rats. In this study, we investigated whether the interstrain differences in Ca(2+) mobilization to serotonin (5HT) result from differences in inositol (1,4,5)trisphosphate (IP(3)) metabolism and/or IP(3) receptor (IP(3)R) sensitivity. Ca(2+) mobilization by 5HT in cultured ASM cells from both rat strains was phospholipase C (PLC) dependent. Inositol polyphosphate accumulation, and hence PLC activity, was similar in both rat strains, but a specific IP(3) transient was detectable only in Fisher myocytes in response to 5HT. These findings suggested that IP(3) degradation rather than production differed between the two strains. The Vmax and Michaelis constant (K(m)) of IP(3)-specific 5-phosphatase activity were higher in the particulate fraction of Lewis than in Fisher ASM cell homogenates and appeared to be related to a greater expression of two isoforms of 5-phosphatase (type I and type II) in Lewis cells as shown by Western blot analysis. The sensitivity of the IP(3)R to IP(3) was similar between Fisher and Lewis ASM cells, indicating that the interstrain intracellular Ca(2+) differences were unrelated to IP(3)R function. We propose that interstrain variations in 5-phosphatase activity and expression may give rise to the interstrain differences in IP(3)-mediated Ca(2+) release in ASM and may be a determinant of AHR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".