MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048922932 · doi:10.1139/p00-081

Diode laser spectroscopy of the weakly bound complex NeCH<sub>4</sub>

2001· article· en· W2048922932 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. Wangler, Daniel Roth, G. Winnewisser, Igor Pak, A. R. W. McKellar

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsPhysicsAtomic physicsAbsorption spectroscopySpectral lineSpectroscopySupersonic speedRotational temperatureInfrared spectroscopyInfraredLaserAbsorption (acoustics)Optics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The infrared absorption spectrum of the weakly bound rare-gas–spherical-top complex Ne–CH 4 was discovered and analyzed for the first time. Measurements were made with tunable diode laser spectrometers using a pulsed supersonic jet and a long-path low-temperature absorption cell. Close to the R(0) transition of the methane ν 4 fundamental band at 1311.430 cm –1 , the Ne–CH 4 spectrum was recorded as a very compact absorption pattern. Within a total wave-number range of about 0.1 cm –1 , P-, Q-, and R-branches are located. As the first step, the Ne–CH 4 spectrum was recorded and analyzed in a supersonic jet at low rotational temperature of about 5 K. Three branches were identified, of which the P- and R-branches were partially resolved and the Q-branch remained unresolved. Compared with the previously measured spectra of Ar–CH 4 and Kr–CH 4 [Z. Naturforsch. A, 53, 725 (1998).], the absorption pattern in the spectrum of Ne–CH 4 is much denser and considerably more compact. However, by analogy with the spectra of Ar–CH 4 and Kr–CH 4 , assignment and analysis were carried out using a Hamiltonian model that incorporates a Coriolis interaction between the total angular momentum of the complex and the angular momentum of the methane monomer. This analysis then allowed us to assign the same spectrum as recorded in a long-path (160 m) cell at a higher temperature of 62 K. The observed rotational constant for Ne–CH 4 , B"= 0.129(9) cm –1 , corresponds to an effective intermolecular separation of 3.8 Å. PACS Nos.: 33.20E, 34.25, 35.20P, 36.40

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.507

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207