MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048951946 · doi:10.7472/jksii.2014.15.4.21

Evaluation of Usefulness of the Protein Drug Feature Information Filed

2014· article· en· W2048951946 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Internet Computing and services · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrugBankUsabilityService (business)Computer scienceData scienceWorld Wide WebDrugMedicineBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

단백질 의약품 산업이 성장함에 따라 단백질 의약품 개발 시 단백질 정보는 필수적으로 인식 되고 있다. 단백질 정보 서비스를 제공하는 대표적인 바이오데이터 센터로는 미국의 NCBI, PDB, 유럽의 EMBL, 일본의 DDBJ 등이 있으며, 각 센터별로 특화된 단백질 정보들이 제공되고 있다. 사용자가 원하는 단백질 정보를 얻기 위해서는 독립된 단백질 정보를 검색하고 이를 통합하고 분석해야하며, 보다 편리하게 접근할 수 있도록 대표적인 데이터 센터 혹은 소규모 프로젝트 별로 바이오데이터에 대한 다양한 웹서비스가 연구 개발되고 있다. 단백질 의약품 정보 서비스에 대한 필요성이 높아지면서 캐나다의 DrugBank, 미국의 GDSC 등에서 의약품 정보와 단백질 데이터를 통합하여 서비스하고 있다. 하지만 사용자가 요구하는 다양한 단백질 정보를 반영하지 못하는 실정이다. 국내의 경우 바이오인포매틱스 인프라가 부족하고, 단백질 의약품 정보 서비스 또한 의약품의 기본 정보와 유통정보만을 제공하는 것에 한정되어 있다. 본 연구에서는 기존 서비스의 한계를 벗어난 한국형 단백질 의약품 전용 서비스 설계를 위한 사전 연구로 기존 대표적 데이터베이스에서는 적용하고 있지 않은 단백질 특성정보필드들을 제시하고 이에 대한 유용성 평가를 전문 종사자를 대상으로 진행하여 기존 바이오데이터베이스의 단백질 정보 필드와 비교하였다. 그 결과 본 연구에서 제시한 단백질 특성정보필드들이 단백질 의약품 정보 서비스에 요구되는 유용한 데이터 필드임을 검증하였다. As the protein drug industry is growing, protein informations are indispensable for the protein drug development. NCBI and PDB in the U.S., the EMBL in Europe and the DDBJ in Japan are the representative centers for bio information and each center provides specific data for protein information. To obtain specific protein information, users are to be collect them from the service sites of each center and then combine or analyze for their purpose. To facilitate the accessibility to bio data, various R&D activities are running for development of diverse web services relevant to bio data in major data centers or small-scale projects. With the recognition of protein information as pivotal for the protein drug development, DrugBank in Canada, GDSC in the U.S. start to provide integrated informations between drugs and proteins. However, those service does not meet users' demands due to lack of diversity. In Korea, infra structures for bioinformatics are limited and the current services for protein drug information are providing only basic information of the drug including distribution data. This is a pilot study to construct a specialized service for protein drug information in Korean style breaking through the limitations of current services. This study proposed new fields for protein characterization information which had not been provided by current services and evaluated their effectiveness and usability by comparing them to the existing fields with expert survey. As a result, the newly proposed fields for protein characterization have been proven to be useful data fields for the service of protein drug information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it