MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048955664 · doi:10.1063/1.4883296

Exact analytic solutions of the Schrödinger equations for some modified q-deformed potentials

2014· article· en· W2048955664 on OpenAlexaff
M. Sebawe Abdalla, Hichem Eleuch

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersKing Saud University
KeywordsEigenfunctionEigenvalues and eigenvectorsGeneralizationContext (archaeology)Wave functionExponential functionFunction (biology)Hyperbolic functionMathematicsMathematical analysisMathematical physicsEnergy (signal processing)PhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we introduce the exact solution for the wave function in the presence of potential energy, consisting of combination between q-deformed hyperbolic and exponential function with different argument. The functions we have used in the present communication can be regarded as a generalization of the Arai q-deformed function (modified q-deformed Morse potential). In this context, we have restricted our discussion for some particular cases of the q-deformed hyperbolic functions. This is due to the difficulty for dealing with most of the arguments included in the potential functions. For the most particular cases, the energy eigenfunctions are obtained, and the behavior is also discussed. It has been shown that the wave functions are sensitive to the variation in the value of q-deformed parameter as well as the strength of the potential parameter λ. Furthermore, the energy eigenvalues are also considered for some particular cases where the argument of the exponential function plays a strong role effecting its value.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.797
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian PhysicsFrench-language works237,207