MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048977551 · doi:10.1117/12.739788

<title>Design of interaction manager supporting collaborative display and multimodal interaction for advanced collaborative environment</title>

2007· article· en· W2048977551 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Su-Jin Ko, Namgon Kim, JongWon Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and dialogue systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHongik UniversityUniversity of TorontoInstitute of Museum and Library Services
KeywordsComputer scienceHuman–computer interactionCollaborative designCollaborative softwareUbiquitous computingInteraction designUser interfaceMultimodal interactionWorld Wide WebSoftware engineeringSystems designOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As ubiquitous computing technologies are rapidly evolving in the area of collaboration, user interactions are also expanding to extremely various styles of embedded computing systems. In order to keep up with this, we propose a unique design of Interaction Manager (IM) for Smart Meeting Space (SMeet), which is our prototype system for Advanced Collaborative Environment (ACE), to support advanced user interactions. In this paper, IM provides generic interfaces and managing methods for heterogeneous interaction devices. Furthermore, these interaction activities can be effectively shared with remote-party collaborators by IM. The preliminary version of proposed IM is verified through experiments between two separately located SMeet nodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicSpeech and dialogue systemsFrench-language works237,207