MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049007999 · doi:10.1021/om100910d

Future Trends in Organometallic Chemistry: Organometallic Approaches to Water Splitting

2011· article· en· W2049007999 on OpenAlexaff
Warren E. Piers

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganometallics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrganometallic chemistryChemistryContext (archaeology)Group 2 organometallic chemistryPetrochemicalOrganic chemistryNanotechnologyCatalysisMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advances in the field of organometallic chemistry have historically been driven by the imperatives of the petrochemical industry. Catalytic manipulation of C−H and C−C bonds is now at an advanced stage of sophistication, although significant opportunities continue to exist in this aspect of organometallic chemistry. However, application of the formidable toolbox of organometallic chemistry—developed in the context of hydrocarbon chemistry—to the sustainable production of environmentally benign solar fuels is a research problem that humanity needs organometallic chemists to tackle. Organometallic approaches to water splitting driven by sunlight will constitute a growing area of focus in the coming years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganometallicsSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207