MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Development of BaTiO<sub>3</sub> Based X7R Wafers for Single-Layer Capacitors

2007· article· en· W2049028266 on OpenAlexaff
Zhengbo Yu, V. D. Krstic, Jack Ng

Bibliographic record

VenueKey engineering materials · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceDielectricSinteringCapacitorDissipation factorCeramic capacitorWaferCapacitanceComposite materialTemperature coefficientHigh-κ dielectricAtmospheric temperature rangeLappingElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringOptoelectronicsElectrodeVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research on the development and characterization of X7R BaTiO3 dielectric wafers for high frequency single-layer capacitors has been carried out. Commercial BaTiO3 powders were processed and optimized in dielectric constant (er), dissipation factor (DF) and temperature coefficient of capacitance (TCC). The results indicate a strong effect of sintering temperature on dielectric properties as well as on mechanical properties of the BaTiO3. It has been shown that the highest dielectric constant is achieved at high sintering temperatures (>1400°C) and lowest TCC at lower sintering temperatures (<1300°C). By optimizing fabrication process e.g. dry pressing, cold isostatic pressing, sintering, and machining such as grinding and lapping, BaTiO3 wafers of dielectric constant from 3400 to 3600, with a diameter approximately 50mm and thickness 150µm, have been manufactured successfully. The fabricated thin wafers exhibit the X7R capacitor characteristics of the dissipation factor (<3%) and temperature coefficient of capacitance (<±15%) in the temperature range of –55°C to 125°C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKey engineering materialsSame topicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric MaterialsFrench-language works237,207