Interatomic interactions and the Cotton—Mouton effect for helium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report calculations of the interaction-induced polarizability (δαanis), magnetizability (δξanis;) and hypermagnetizability (δηanis) anisotropies for the helium gas as a function of the interatomic separation. From these data we determine the virial coefficients for the Cotton—Mouton effect and the hypermagnetizability anisotropy of helium. We also find the mean polarizability and magnetizability as a function of the interatomic separation and the virial coefficients for these properties. The results for the Cotton—Mouton effect indicate that pressure affects the Cotton—Mouton constant to the same extent as it does the second hyperpolarizability (γ) and the virial coefficient bCME(ω, T) lies in the range of −1.6 to −1.8 cm3 mol−1. This means that pressure effects for the Cotton-Mouton constant could be detected with modern experimental techniques. All calculations were carried out using the full configuration interaction technique and large basis sets of London atomic orbitals. The polarizability calculations were performed both for relevant optical frequencies as well as the static case.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".