Interatomic interactions and the Cotton—Mouton effect for helium
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We report calculations of the interaction-induced polarizability (δαanis), magnetizability (δξanis;) and hypermagnetizability (δηanis) anisotropies for the helium gas as a function of the interatomic separation. From these data we determine the virial coefficients for the Cotton—Mouton effect and the hypermagnetizability anisotropy of helium. We also find the mean polarizability and magnetizability as a function of the interatomic separation and the virial coefficients for these properties. The results for the Cotton—Mouton effect indicate that pressure affects the Cotton—Mouton constant to the same extent as it does the second hyperpolarizability (γ) and the virial coefficient bCME(ω, T) lies in the range of −1.6 to −1.8 cm3 mol−1. This means that pressure effects for the Cotton-Mouton constant could be detected with modern experimental techniques. All calculations were carried out using the full configuration interaction technique and large basis sets of London atomic orbitals. The polarizability calculations were performed both for relevant optical frequencies as well as the static case.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it