Improvement of Adjuvant Systems to Obtain a Cost-Effective Production of High Levels of Specific IgY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Incomplete Freund's adjuvant (IFA) is used as standard adjuvant for the production of specific antibodies. In this study, we evaluated the ability of supplementation of IFA with 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) [1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3)] or C-phosphate-guanosine-oligodeoxynucleotide (CpG-ODN) to enhance the quantity of specific IgY found in the eggs of hyperimmunized laying hens. In this comparative study, the fimbrial adhesin F4 of porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli was used as prototype immunogen. Hens of 3 groups received by i.m. injection 20 microg of purified F4 adhesin emulsified with 1 of the following adjuvants: 0.5 mL of IFA alone (F4-IFA group), 0.5 mL of IFA supplemented with 285.6 ng of 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) (F4-IFA-D(3) group), or 0.5 mL of IFA supplemented with 10 microg of CpG-ODN (F4-IFA-CpG group). Hens of 2 control groups received PBS or purified F4 alone. Immunization was repeated after 2 and 5 or 7 wk. Eggs were collected at 3- to 4-d intervals from preimmunization to d 79, and whole eggs were tested to measure the quantity of anti-F4 IgY by a standardized indirect ELISA. The quantity of specific anti-F4 IgY present in eggs from immunized hens of the F4-IFA group increased from d 13 to 79, corresponding to the end of the experiment. The values for this group at each time were considered as 100%. Results obtained for the other adjuvants were expressed in relation to this reference method. Supplementation of IFA with 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) did not result in any enhancement of the quantity of anti-F4 IgY present in the eggs. On the other hand, supplementation of IFA with CpG-ODN resulted in an enhancement of yield up to 942% of the F4-specific antibody response. Moreover, the use of CpG-ODN is a cost-effective and ethical refinement for the production of specific antibodies, permitting a reduction in the number of immunizations needed. In conclusion, this study provides strong evidence for the use of IFA supplemented with CpG-ODN rather than IFA alone for the production of high levels of specific antibody in laying hens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".