Using Human Microarrays to Identify Differentially Expressed Genes Associated with Increased Steroidogenesis in Boars
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human microarrays are readily available, and it would be advantageous if they could be used to study gene expression in other species, such as pigs. The objectives of this research were to validate the use of human microarrays in the analysis of porcine gene expression, to assess the variability of the data generated, and to compare gene expression in boars with different levels of steroidogenesis. Cytochrome b5 (CYB5) expression was used to assess array detection sensitivity. Samples having high or low CYB5 RNA levels were hybridized to microarrays to determine if the known expression difference could be detected. Six hybridizations were conducted using human microarrays containing 3840 total spots representing 1718 characterized human ESTs. To analyze gene expression in boars with different levels of steroidogenesis, testis RNA from four boars with high levels of plasma estrone sulphate was hybridized to testis RNA from four boars with lower levels. Eight microarray hybridizations were conducted including fluor-flips. Self-self hybridizations were also conducted to assess the variability of array experiments. The Cy5 and Cy3 intensity values for each array were normalized using a locally weighted linear regression (LOESS). Statistical significance was assessed using a Student's t-test followed by the Benjamini and Hochberg multiple testing correction procedure. Quantitative real-time PCR (Q-RT-PCR) was used to verify select gene expression differences. The results show that CYB5 was significantly overexpressed in the high CYB5 sample by 1.8 fold (P < 0.05), verifying the known expression difference. The average log2 ratio of the majority of genes (1643) falls within one standard deviation of the mean, indicating the data were reproducible. In the high versus low steroidogenesis experiment, seven genes were significantly overexpressed in the high group (P < 0.05). Quantitative real-time PCR was used to validate five genes with the highest fold change, and the results corroborated those found by the microarray experiments. The results of the self-self hybridizations showed that no genes were significantly differentially expressed following the application of the Benjamini and Hochberg multiple testing correction procedure. The results presented in this report show that human arrays can be used for gene expression analysis in pigs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".