MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049085908 · doi:10.1515/advg.2005.5.4.583

Positivity, sums of squares and the multi-dimensional moment problem II

2005· article· en· W2049085908 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Geometry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLemma (botany)MathematicsSection (typography)Algebraic numberMathematical proofMoment problemMoment (physics)Discrete mathematicsExplained sum of squaresCombinatoricsAlgebra over a fieldPure mathematicsMathematical analysisComputer scienceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The paper is a continuation of work initiated by the first two authors in [S. Kuhlmann, M. Marshall, Positivity, sums of squares and the multi-dimensional moment problem. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 354 (2002), 4285–4301]. Section 1 is introductory. In Section 2 we prove a basic lemma, Lemma 2.1, and use it to give new proofs of key technical results of Scheiderer in [C. Scheiderer, Sums of squares of regular functions on real algebraic varieties. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 352 (2000), 1039–1069] [C. Scheiderer, Sums of squares on real algebraic curves. Math. Z. 245 (2003), 725–760] in the compact case; see Corollaries 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5. Lemma 2.1 is also used in Section 3 where we continue the examination of the case n = 1 initiated in [S. Kuhlmann, M. Marshall, Positivity, sums of squares and the multi-dimensional moment problem. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 354 (2002), 4285–4301], concentrating on the compact case. In Section 4 we prove certain uniform degree bounds for representations in the case n = 1, which we then use in Section 5 to prove that (‡) holds for basic closed semi-algebraic subsets of cylinders with compact cross-section, provided the generators satisfy certain conditions; see Theorem 5.3 and Corollary 5.5. Theorem 5.3 provides a partial answer to a question raised by Schmüdgen in [K. Schmüdgen, On the moment problem of closed semi-algebraic sets. J. Reine Angew. Math. 558 (2003), 225–234]. We also show that, for basic closed semi-algebraic subsets of cylinders with compact cross-section, the sufficient conditions for (SMP) given in [K. Schmüdgen, On the moment problem of closed semi-algebraic sets. J. Reine Angew. Math. 558 (2003), 225–234] are also necessary; see Corollary 5.2(b). In Section 6 we prove a module variant of the result in [K. Schmüdgen, On the moment problem of closed semi-algebraic sets. J. Reine Angew. Math. 558 (2003), 225–234], in the same spirit as Putinar’s variant [M. Putinar, Positive polynomials on compact semi-algebraic sets. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 42 (1993), 969–984] of the result in [K. Schmüdgen, The K-moment problem for compact semi-algebraic sets. Math. Ann. 289 (1991), 203–206] in the compact case; see Theorem 6.1. We apply this to basic closed semi-algebraic subsets of cylinders with compact cross-section; see Corollary 6.4. In Section 7 we apply the results from Section 5 to solve two of the open problems listed in [S. Kuhlmann, M. Marshall, Positivity, sums of squares and the multi-dimensional moment problem. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 354 (2002), 4285–4301]; see Corollary 7.1 and Corollary 7.4. In Section 8 we consider a number of examples in the plane. In Section 9 we list some open problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.474
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it