Escaping to the Surface: A Phylogenetically Independent Analysis of Hypoxia‐Induced Respiratory Behaviors in Sculpins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Behavioral responses to progressive hypoxia exposure were assessed in several species of fish from the family Cottidae (sculpins), which are distributed along the near-shore marine environment and differ in their hypoxia tolerance. The use of aquatic surface respiration (ASR) and aerial emergence as a response to progressive decreases in environmental O(2) differed between intertidal and subtidal sculpins. Intertidal sculpins consistently displayed ASR followed by emergence behaviors, while the subtidal species performed these behaviors at low frequency or not at all. There was a significant negative correlation between the O(2) thresholds for the onset of ASR and critical O(2) tensions (P(crit), a measure of hypoxia tolerance), such that the hypoxia-tolerant species performed ASR at higher O(2) tensions than the more hypoxia-sensitive species. There was no relationship between the O(2) thresholds for emergence and P(crit). When restricted from accessing the water surface during progressive decreases in O(2), all species of sculpin displayed the same sequence of behaviors including agitation, attempts to escape, quiescence, and unresponsiveness. The only behavior from this suite that correlated with P(crit) was the first sign of agitation, which occurred at a lower O(2) tension in the most hypoxia-tolerant species. With the application of phylogenetically independent contrasts, all the relationships between behavior and P(crit) were nonsignificant, which limits our capacity to separate selection-driven changes in behavior from the phylogenetic signal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".