MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049148448 · doi:10.14740/jmc.v6i1.2004

Cataract Obscuring a Large Primary Choroidal Melanoma and Associated Exudative Retinal Detachment in the Left Eye: A Case Report

2015· article· en· W2049148448 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Efthalia Ntora, Dimitrios Stefanos Nanas, Nikolaos Dragoumis, Stefanos Maloutas, Panagiotis Oikonomidis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Oncology and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEnucleationChoroidOphthalmologyRetinal detachmentMelanomaVisual acuityEye EnucleationMalignancyChoroidal melanomaCiliary bodyRetinalSurgeryRetinaPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Choroidal melanoma is the most common primary malignant intraocular tumor that rarely is left undiagnosed. We report a case of a lately detected choroidal melanoma associated with exudative retinal detachment and severe visual loss in the affected eye. The patient was referred to our clinic with visual acuity in the right eye 6/6 while in the left eye was limited to light perception. Ophthalmic examination showed a large pigmented choroidal tumoral mass occupying most of the vitreous cavity and associated exudative retinal detachment. Ultrasonography confirmed a dome-shaped tumor with internal homogeneity, while anterior choroid, ciliary body and angle were found with no invasion. The fellow eye was examined thoroughly and no lesions were detected. Further clinical investigation for metastasis was negative. Negligence of the symptoms, gradual evolution of the tumor and late referral resulted in irreversible loss of vision. The patient had no other systemic pathology and was advised for enucleation in the left eye and follow-up. Choroidal melanoma is a serious malignancy that could threaten the patient’s life and requires early detection and treatment. In large lesions enucleation is the treatment of choice. J Med Cases. 2015;6(1):10-13 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jmc2004w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0060.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicOcular Oncology and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207