Aerosol Therapy of Asthma: Principles and Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aerosols are the mainstay of therapy of reversible airflow obstruction. Currently available aerosols include bronchodilators such as beta-adrenoceptor agonists and anticholinergic agents which may be used alone or together with prophylactic, anti-inflammatory medications such as sodium cromoglycate and steroids. These agents are characterized by primarily topical activity and thus result in minimal systemic effects. By combining these medications in optimum doses, most patients can be readily managed. In patients with severe airway hyperreactivity, aerosols may need to be combined with oral sustained-release theophylline compounds and/or systemic steroids, the latter being used in minimum doses and if possible on alternate days to minimize adrenal suppression and steroid-related systemic complications. In recent years, an improved understanding of aerosol physics, pharmacology and airway physiology has led to greatly improved aerosol therapy with increasing emphasis on metered dose inhalers as the delivery system of choice while nebulizers are used less frequently except in hospital and pediatric applications. The use of intermittent positive-pressure devices for aerosol delivery has decreased considerably as physicians recognize that simpler delivery methods work equally well at much lower cost. While aerosol therapy techniques are now well worked out, research is continuing on methods of improving the efficiency of aerosol delivery and in the development of newer pharmacological agents such as longer-acting adrenoceptor agonists, calcium channel blockers, antagonists of mediators derived from arachidonic acid as well as higher dose aerosolized steroids.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".