MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049163448 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450790515

Rate equations for the fischer‐tropsch reaction on a promoted iron catalyst

2001· article· en· W2049163448 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCatalysts for Methane Reforming
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFischer–Tropsch processCarbon monoxideCatalysisSpace velocityHydrogenChemistryReaction rateWater-gas shift reactionReaction rate constantThermodynamicsAtmospheric temperature rangeCarbon fibersDiffusionActivation energyInorganic chemistryChemical engineeringPhysical chemistryMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryKineticsPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Intrinsic rates for the Fischer‐Tropsch synthesis reaction over a promoted iron catalyst fabricated at the Research Institute of the Petroleum Industry (RIPI) have been obtained in the temperature range of 290°C to 310°C, pressure range of 1500 to 2300 kPa, molar hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio of 0.76 to 1.82, and a space velocity of 3300 h −1 under conditions of constant catalyst activity. To this end, the initial reaction rates have been measured at constant temperature (±1°C) in the absence of diffusion limitations, and power‐law equations have been fitted in terms of the hydrogen and carbon monoxide partial pressures for the reaction rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score0.470

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it