La participation sur les espaces de contenus générés par les utilisateurs, une exploitation collaborative
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En partant des notions de prosumer et de crowdsourcing, nous montrons en quoi la théorie critique permet de saisir les mutations des formes de participation en ligne. Nous argumentons que le prosuming s’inscrit dans une logique de récupération capitalistique de la participation dans une logique de délocalisation du travail en dehors des murs des entreprises. Ce texte construit sur un débat sur les catégories de l’analyse marxiste traditionnelle que sont le temps de travail et le travail salarié (Fuchs, 2010, 2012 ; Arvidsson et Colleoni, 2012). Nous cherchons à montrer que l’insertion des formes de prosuming dans les stratégies commerciales des entreprises procède d’un processus de liquéfaction des formes du travail dans le capitalisme avancé et doit donc être analysé comme une forme de travail.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".